I started with GW2, decided to go play GW1. In any case, this serves to drag out combat significantly (the last thing I wanted to do lol). like, "YOU CAN TRY OUT THESE SKILLS" and "CLICK HERE TO MAKE PERMANENT".Īfter spending 3hrs in the game running around everywhere, I'm stuck with a useless pet, a HoT that takes almost as long to cast as to work, and that's about it. It should have been explained what this all meant. Anyways, I'm a Misamer.Mageisma or whatever you call that class AND I apparently I agreed to a "second profession". "I did 3.6dmg!" does the game round it up and call it a 4? or stay at 3. in WHOLE numbers then it doesn't matter unless they're rounding up. They give me a beginners bow that does more DPS than my crappy wand (it has +20% dmg but when you're doing 3-5dmg, that is laughably negligble, for example 20% of 3 is. I went to this ranger and confirmed I wanted to try their abilities. The game is pretty vague on goals.įor example, some NPCs were giving me abilities. Funny Games slaps you in the face and taunts you and it rarely gives in to what you need as a viewer, and that may be frustrating at times but at least it's something different.I already read what happens.
I'm not stupid enough to say one has to like this film, I get annoyed at some indie type films and their quirkiness myself, but some of the 1 star reviewers sound like a bunch of crybabies. Not to sound condescending, but maybe people who watch subtitled non-English films are more accepting of weird, offbeat films that don't follow conventional Hollywood style dialogue, plot and presentation, and they're more open to this movies style of direction, like the very long takes of people just sitting there in misery. The original right now has a rating of 7.7 at IMDb and many glowing reviews, yet this U.S version is a lot lower at 6.4 and many b*tching and moaning 1 star reviews. Either way, I was willing to put their passiveness aside because everything else in the film was done so well. Maybe some people would be paralyzed out of fear like this family. Yeah that's entertaining too but we've seen that a million times already. where everyone is a hero and fights back and we all cheer and go home.
#STUPID GAME CAST HOW TO#
Their comfortable existence has been shattered and they don't know how to react. People who are not violent and erroneously think everyone, even these two sick guys, have a better nature they can appeal to by simply saying "why don't you just leave us alone and go?" They've been sheltered from people who are simply evil and lack empathy and just don't give a sh*t. However, an argument can be made that the family reacted realistically because they were portrayed as rich, docile people who listened to classical music and went boating. Naomi Watt's, who is in amazing shape at 40, looked like she might have done something more to get out of it. In the beginning the two bad guys are armed with only a golf club. One possible flaw that I agree with others is the family seemed too passive. Version doesn't quite have that, but even so I still think he does well. Arno played it so well, there was a threatening menace underneath the polite and clean-cut exterior. Maybe it was Arno Frisch, who played the main bad guy in the original, an absolutely ice cold character.
Here the acting is good especially from one of the best actresses out there Naomi Watts, but somehow the original works better. It was one of the most disturbing and effective films I've ever seen. Although this is almost identical and I liked this remake, I prefer the 1997 Austrian original version. It shows what real horror might look like in an awful situation, and how it psychologically debilitates and paralyzes the people involved. It's about horror films and us, the audience who gets pleasure from suffering as entertainment. It's not a standard horror film aiming to fulfill your needs as a viewer.
One way to get the most out of Funny Games is to have your expectations open before watching it.
0 kommentar(er)
